When I talk about migration I'm talkin about users which already have emails in their inboxes (for example because they use james-2.3.x and want to upgrade). For new emails only the "new" repository should be used.
Just to make it clear.... Bye, Norman 2010/1/20 Dhrubo <[email protected]>: > I am also for single repository and 2 views > That way no migration or move is required. > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Mario Zsilak <[email protected]>wrote: > >> +1 >> >> However, one comment: >> I would like to see that, if a POP3 user fetches his mails, he shall see >> all >> of them (in all folders) - with the difference to IMAP that he doesn't see >> his folder structure but only INBOX. At least it should be configurable. >> >> ---- >> >> What I can say from my experience in my company: >> After 4 years of POP3, we finally convinced the company management to >> upgrade our email package (hosted service) so that it includes IMAP. The >> domain hoster told us that they can't migrate users / mails from POP3 to >> IMAP and we had to do it manually ... >> >> Let's do it better! OK, we may use RemoteManager and "movemails", but I >> believe having a single Repository would be still better :) >> >> Kind regards, >> Mario >> >> >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> >Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> >Im Auftrag von Norman Maurer >> >Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2010 12:38 >> >An: James Developers List >> >Betreff: MailRepository and MailboxManager >> > >> >Hi all, >> > >> >after I already brought this up some time in the past I thought a bit >> >more about MailRepository and MailboxManager. I'm still in favor to >> >just use one Repository for IMAP and POP3. I think its a no go to ship >> >different "storages" for the protocols. I know the requirement for >> >POP3 and IMAP are totally different but shouldn't it be possible to >> >write some adapter which will just expose the Mails via the >> >MailRepository interface but use an underlying MailboxManager to fetch >> >it ? >> > >> >So when an User would use IMAP he would get all he features of >> >MailboxManager, if he use POP3 he will just see the emails in the >> >Folder INBOX. Thats exactly how many unix mailserver do it. Like >> >Dovecot, Courier etc. So it can't be the worst idea =P >> > >> >Then we could mark the old implementations with "@deprecated" and >> >remove them later, or beeing more radical remove them now. >> >Mailmigration could just work with the RemoteManager and "movemails" >> >command. >> > >> >WDYT ? >> > >> >I think I remember Robert didn'T like the idea to much in the past.. >> > >> >Bye, >> >Norman >> > >> >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > -- > Thanks ... Dhrubo > My Book - http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430210095 > > My Blog - > http://www.jtraining.com/blogs/blogger/dhrubo/ > > LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/dhrubo > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
