Agreed. Can we add a migration util ;) On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Norman Maurer <[email protected] > wrote:
> When I talk about migration I'm talkin about users which already have > emails in their inboxes (for example because they use james-2.3.x and > want to upgrade). For new emails only the "new" repository should be > used. > > Just to make it clear.... > > Bye, > Norman > > > 2010/1/20 Dhrubo <[email protected]>: > > I am also for single repository and 2 views > > That way no migration or move is required. > > > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Mario Zsilak <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> However, one comment: > >> I would like to see that, if a POP3 user fetches his mails, he shall see > >> all > >> of them (in all folders) - with the difference to IMAP that he doesn't > see > >> his folder structure but only INBOX. At least it should be configurable. > >> > >> ---- > >> > >> What I can say from my experience in my company: > >> After 4 years of POP3, we finally convinced the company management to > >> upgrade our email package (hosted service) so that it includes IMAP. The > >> domain hoster told us that they can't migrate users / mails from POP3 to > >> IMAP and we had to do it manually ... > >> > >> Let's do it better! OK, we may use RemoteManager and "movemails", but I > >> believe having a single Repository would be still better :) > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> Mario > >> > >> >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> >Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected] > ] > >> >Im Auftrag von Norman Maurer > >> >Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2010 12:38 > >> >An: James Developers List > >> >Betreff: MailRepository and MailboxManager > >> > > >> >Hi all, > >> > > >> >after I already brought this up some time in the past I thought a bit > >> >more about MailRepository and MailboxManager. I'm still in favor to > >> >just use one Repository for IMAP and POP3. I think its a no go to ship > >> >different "storages" for the protocols. I know the requirement for > >> >POP3 and IMAP are totally different but shouldn't it be possible to > >> >write some adapter which will just expose the Mails via the > >> >MailRepository interface but use an underlying MailboxManager to fetch > >> >it ? > >> > > >> >So when an User would use IMAP he would get all he features of > >> >MailboxManager, if he use POP3 he will just see the emails in the > >> >Folder INBOX. Thats exactly how many unix mailserver do it. Like > >> >Dovecot, Courier etc. So it can't be the worst idea =P > >> > > >> >Then we could mark the old implementations with "@deprecated" and > >> >remove them later, or beeing more radical remove them now. > >> >Mailmigration could just work with the RemoteManager and "movemails" > >> >command. > >> > > >> >WDYT ? > >> > > >> >I think I remember Robert didn'T like the idea to much in the past.. > >> > > >> >Bye, > >> >Norman > >> > > >> >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> >For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Thanks ... Dhrubo > > My Book - http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430210095 > > > > My Blog - > > http://www.jtraining.com/blogs/blogger/dhrubo/ > > > > LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/dhrubo > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Thanks ... Dhrubo My Book - http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430210095 My Blog - http://www.jtraining.com/blogs/blogger/dhrubo/ LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/dhrubo
