true enough.. But let us first do the jms spooling.. then cut M1.

I will start to commit changes to trunk then.

Bye,
Norman

2010/2/24 Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]>:
> 2010/2/24 Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]>:
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Norman Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I started to work on a JMS implementation for spooling in JAMES. Its
>>> workin but still more a POC then anything else. Anyway I would like to
>>> commit it to work on it in svn and do small commits. Because its not
>>> stable yet and not production ready should I better use a sandbox and
>>> merge it later ? or are the others ok with having some "in progress"
>>> trunk ?
>>
>> i'm a big fan of making progress in trunk. even when 3 is production
>> ready, i would much prefer to see trunk push ahead and take production
>> branches off it.
>
> +1
>
> Stefano
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to