Ok first version of JMS spooling is in trunk now.. Its far from perfect performant-wise. But It shows the idea..
Bye, Norman 2010/2/25 Norman Maurer <[email protected]>: > true enough.. But let us first do the jms spooling.. then cut M1. > > I will start to commit changes to trunk then. > > Bye, > Norman > > 2010/2/24 Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]>: >> 2010/2/24 Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]>: >>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Norman Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I started to work on a JMS implementation for spooling in JAMES. Its >>>> workin but still more a POC then anything else. Anyway I would like to >>>> commit it to work on it in svn and do small commits. Because its not >>>> stable yet and not production ready should I better use a sandbox and >>>> merge it later ? or are the others ok with having some "in progress" >>>> trunk ? >>> >>> i'm a big fan of making progress in trunk. even when 3 is production >>> ready, i would much prefer to see trunk push ahead and take production >>> branches off it. >> >> +1 >> >> Stefano >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
