+1, Netty being a popular OpenSource project, If it performs better, it is enough for me.
-Manolo On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Norman Maurer <nor...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > due the last weeks we encountered some problems realted to memory > usage etc. To see if the problem is within MINA (or our usage of > MINA), I wrote a socket implementation using NETTY > (http://www.jboss.org/netty). Since the release of NETTY 3.x its > license under the ASL2. The Framework is written by Trustin Lee which > was one of the main authors of MINA, before he dedicited to leave the > project. > > Now it seems like MINA it self is not the problem with the OOM. It > seems it was caused by some infinity loop which was caused by some > "bad" usage ( but I still think it should not happen if MINA would be > a bit smarter about this...). Anyway after more tests it seems like > NETTY just performs better in terms of CPU and Memory. I would even > say its "better" maintained.. > > I know all the "eat you own dogfood" voices, but I would like to just > remove all the MINA code and only use NETTY. > > Thoughts ? > > Bye, > Norman > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
