+1, makes sense.. How about a patch ;) ?
Thx, Norman 2010/5/5 Eric Charles <eric.char...@u-mangate.com>: > Hi, > > I understand org.apache.james.impl.jamesuser.LocalJamesUsersRepository > should be used for 2.3 compatibility and > org.apache.james.impl.user.LocalUsersRepository for fresh 3 installations. > > Is this the case ? > > Tks, > > Eric > > PS1 : Comment in spring-beans.xml could mention the full classpath > (org.apache.james.impl.user.LocalUsersRepository) to avoid any ambiguity. > PS2 : Default for our coming M1 release could be > org.apache.james.impl.user.LocalUsersRepository, migrating from 2.3 to 3 > being a story still to be written. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
