On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 18:04, Eric Charles <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > The ideal would be to have windows and linux (virtual) server with jdk 1.5 > and enough memory (2GB?). > > I don't know if apache or Bernd's infra can offer this.
james-testing.de would be a Debian machine running 1.5 (or 1.6 alternatively). > I was also thinking to benchmarks (james/windows vs james/linux, james vs > other mails servers, james maildir vs james jpa,...), so Bernd's infra would > be best suited to changes,... > > On these operating systems, we could deploy continuum (or hudson?) to > trigger/automate the tests (being called via maven). We have at least Hudson running at the ASF. > In first instance (maybe after), i don't see the need to create real james > accounts for committers,... > > I have happily used postage a few times (when we were searching for oom on > smtp), but before going to that "integration testing" level, I still think > that a lower level provided by mpt would be welcome (but I don't know if mpt > is already usable). > > We could imagine start with a postage maven plugin that would load james in > memory (without the need for a real distribution on disk). This would be a > challenge in the current configuration, but feasible (load spring and conf > from classpath). This would be also a real added value to have an > "embeddable James server". For james-testing.de I'm currently thinking of a production-like setup. It would run selected builds, not nightlies, more the milestones category. RAM would be around 1GB. Running postage against it would be a good app I think. Bernd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
