(sorry for the noise, last email sent prematurely, more inline)

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:51, Eric Charles <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Bernd,
>
> That sound really great!
> If OK to everyone, I could setup something to automate the tests  based on
>  postage.

That'd be great!

>
> Do you plan to send ssh account to james committers?

Nope. :-)

> Take your time, there's really no emergency, I'm full busy for now.

Realistically, I'll get to it in December.

  Bernd

>
> Tks,
>
> Eric
>
>
> On 19/11/2010 12:04, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 18:04, Eric Charles<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The ideal would be to have windows and linux (virtual) server with jdk
>>> 1.5
>>> and enough memory (2GB?).
>>>
>>> I don't know if apache or Bernd's infra can offer this.
>>
>> james-testing.de would be a Debian machine running 1.5 (or 1.6
>> alternatively).
>>
>>> I was also thinking to benchmarks (james/windows vs james/linux,  james
>>> vs
>>> other mails servers, james maildir vs james jpa,...), so Bernd's infra
>>> would
>>> be best suited to changes,...
>>>
>>> On these operating systems, we could deploy continuum (or hudson?) to
>>> trigger/automate the tests (being called via maven).
>>
>> We have at least Hudson running at the ASF.
>>
>>> In first instance (maybe after), i don't see the need to create real
>>> james
>>> accounts for committers,...
>>>
>>> I have happily used postage a few times (when we were searching for oom
>>> on
>>> smtp), but before going to that "integration testing" level, I still
>>> think
>>> that a lower level provided by mpt would be welcome (but I don't know if
>>> mpt
>>> is already usable).
>>>
>>> We could imagine start with a postage maven plugin that would load james
>>> in
>>> memory (without the need for a real distribution on disk). This would be
>>> a
>>> challenge in the current configuration, but feasible (load spring and
>>> conf
>>> from classpath). This would be also a real added value to have an
>>> "embeddable James server".
>>
>> For james-testing.de I'm currently thinking of a production-like
>> setup. It would run selected builds, not nightlies, more the
>> milestones category. RAM would be around 1GB.
>> Running postage against it would be a good app I think.
>>
>>   Bernd
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to