On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Kiran Ayyagari <[email protected]> wrote: >> hello dev, >> >> I have been trying to configure James version 2.3.2 to use LDAP user >> repository based on the page [1], after initial configuration >> I have encountered the known issue [2], finally after tweaking the >> code a bit am able to connect to James through LDAP authentication >> however sending of mail is not working due to some reason not yet >> completely known to me >> (note that sending mail works for me with the default configuration). >> >> Is there anyway to get James work with existing LDAP user repository >> (of course with few more fixes)? >> >> If not then am thinking of writing a new LDAP user repo. > > James 2.x isn't under active development (and hasn't been for some > time). James 3.x has lots of advantages, new features and is close to > being proven. Have you tried James 3? > no, the production environment is still heavily dependent on 2.3.2, however after making a couple of fixes am able to make James use ldap repository > Robert > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
-- Kiran Ayyagari --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
