Would you mind to "contribute" this fixes ? Thanks, Norman
2011/5/3 Kiran Ayyagari <[email protected]>: > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Kiran Ayyagari <[email protected]> wrote: >>> hello dev, >>> >>> I have been trying to configure James version 2.3.2 to use LDAP user >>> repository based on the page [1], after initial configuration >>> I have encountered the known issue [2], finally after tweaking the >>> code a bit am able to connect to James through LDAP authentication >>> however sending of mail is not working due to some reason not yet >>> completely known to me >>> (note that sending mail works for me with the default configuration). >>> >>> Is there anyway to get James work with existing LDAP user repository >>> (of course with few more fixes)? >>> >>> If not then am thinking of writing a new LDAP user repo. >> >> James 2.x isn't under active development (and hasn't been for some >> time). James 3.x has lots of advantages, new features and is close to >> being proven. Have you tried James 3? >> > no, the production environment is still heavily dependent on 2.3.2, > however after making a couple of fixes > am able to make James use ldap repository >> Robert >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > > -- > Kiran Ayyagari > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
