Hi Robert, I still don't get your point and I really disagree about "commenting out". If you are really only worried about the jsw thing then you could "just" coment out the jsw-daemon generation, at least this would give use "normal" startup scripts which are usable. With the comment plugin its impossible for us to cut a new release...
Bye, Norman 2011/6/12 Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> wrote: >> Well, I just noticed that the license.txt content are just the "MIT >> license" repeated twice (for 2 different copyright holders). >> MIT license is a category A and I guess we are safe with it. >> >> Does this answer Robert concerns? > > My major concern is that there is no public license for the artifact > in Maven central. A clean fork, review of the IP and release of a new > artifact would probably work. > > To avoid potential legal complications for release managers, I'm going > to comment out the plugin until we find a resolution. > > Robert > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
