One more thing. The pom has this date: 2008/03/07 Here is the license page from archive.org at that time (2008/03/17): http://web.archive.org/web/20080317033310/http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org/doc/english/license.html
You can see the double MIT license there: the same contained in the file. I think there is enough evidence that that work was released under that license (MIT) and not the GPLv2. Is this convicing for you? Stefano 2011/6/12 Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]>: > 2011/6/12 Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]>: >> [1] >> https://fisheye.codehaus.org/browse/mojo/tags/appassembler-1.0/appassembler-maven-plugin/pom.xml?r=9048 >> [2] >> <groupId>tanukisoft</groupId> >> <artifactId>wrapper-delta-pack</artifactId> >> <version>3.2.3</version> >> <type>tar.gz</type> >> [3] >> http://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=tanukisoft/wrapper-delta-pack/3.2.3/wrapper-delta-pack-3.2.3.pom >> [5] http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org/doc/english/license.html > > Hi Robert, > > The pom you refer has an url to a page that is changed since the pom > has been created. > If you go on central and download the real package referred by the pom > data you get this one: > http://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=tanukisoft/wrapper-delta-pack/3.2.3/wrapper-delta-pack-3.2.3.tar.gz > > Just opening the tar.gz and browsing to the doc/license.txt file will > get you the "double MIT" license text. > > Why should we care of the URL in the pom ([3] and [5]) if the real > artifact (in [1] and [2]) has the correct data?. > > Stefano > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
