Hi, Thanks for MAILBOX-11
I am sorry, I didn't notice it for MAILBOX-73... I'll comment on JAMES-1579 right now. Regards, Benoit Tellier On 02/06/15 14:55, Eric Charles wrote: > Thx Benoit. > > I have committed MAILBOX -11 > MAILBOX-73 was already done > Can you comment on JAMES-1579? I am not sure what you mean. > > > On 2015-05-29 18:35, Benoit Tellier wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Thank you so much Eric for taking the time to have a look at our patchs. >> >> Just a little note : the reporter on the JIRA ticket is not always the >> one that wrote the patch. In such case, the patch writer is mentioned in >> the comments. >> >> Finally, here are our pending reviews : >> >> MAILBOX-11 >> >> We added filter on namespace and user at the store level and >> corrected the memory implementation. >> We run tests on MPT and validate that we solved the problem >> >> MAILBOX-73 >> >> We added generic tests on mappers and run it on Cassandra back end >> >> JAMES-1579 >> >> Part of a patch from JAMES-1578 that was not applied. We still need >> jar on which SieveManagerMailet relies to be imported. >> >> MAILBOX-219 >> >> Warning !!! Two patchs here. ( A bug can hide another ) >> We are writing failing test on current ACL system and then >> corrected it. >> >> MAILBOX-232 >> MAILET-95 >> MIM4J-245 >> JAMES-1310 >> >> Check the return value of file operations. ( We did it in other >> James sub projects ) >> >> Regards, >> >> Benoit Tellier >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
