Hello Antoine,

Thank you for your reply.
I faced out with problem. I can't push code to repository on
https://github.com/apache/james-project

I have got error:
remote: Permission to apache/james-project.git denied to lysenkovsts.
fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/apache/james-project.git/': The
requested URL returned error: 403

Can you help me to resolve this issue?

Also I don't know what branch name will be correct for my code. On my local
repository I named branch as JAMES-subaddressing. What do you think about
that branch name?

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Antoine DUPRAT <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thank you for using James.
> We are really happy to receive contribution, you can create a pull request
> on GitHub:
> https://github.com/apache/james-project
>
> Have a nice day,
> Antoine Duprat
>
>
> Hello All,
>>
>> Our team successfuly used James mail server for a project untile we've got
>> a requirement to support sub-addressing. It turned out that James does not
>> support a tag appended to the local part of email address (ex:
>> [email protected]). RFC 5233, refers to this convention as
>> sub-addressing, but it is also known as plus addressing or tagged
>> addressing. To resolve this issue our team have developed
>> 'SubAddressingValidRcptHandler' which extends from
>> 'org.apache.james.smtpserver.fastfail.ValidRcptHandler' class. Also to
>> find
>> the right addressee by email address with sub-addressing we have developed
>> matcher 'SubAddressingMatcher'.
>>
>> I do not know if you have plans to implement the sub-addressing support. I
>> can send you our code for review and will be happy if our changes save
>> time
>> for other developers who faced with the same issue as we had.
>>
>> Please let me know if that makes sense and which way I can send the code
>> for review.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Sergey Lysenkov
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to