Thank you Benoit. > Here is the link: http://james.apache.org/server/install.html (SMTP)
Ok nice, thanks!! > We may not want to advertise POP much given that its integration test > coverage is low. Then how about deprecating POP? Or completely eliminating it? Just a thought, but if the usage is low and it is not “reliable” due to limited test coverage, then why keep it around at all? In any case, I could remove all the sections about POP if necessary… > It makes perfect sense for JMAP however James current implementation > relies on an outdated draft version, that we are currently upgrading to > RFC-8621, thus I would consider it early to demonstrate it. Ok, fair enough. Cheers, =David
