On 10/06/2021 21:33, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote: > [...] > > So - again; What about having a Username-class which is just > that, /any/ username? Again, this would violates quite a lot of logic inside James itself.
I have personnally no problem with contribution: - Allow subclassing of Username if that can help. - Introduce a (say) LoginName POJO within /protocols/imap - Anything helping modularizing protocols/imap But changing such a central class for a specific use case, in the scope of the entire James server, do not seem acceptable to me. Benoit > > -- > *Andreas Joseph Krogh* > CTO / Partner - Visena AS > Mobile: +47 909 56 963 > andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com> > www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com> > <https://www.visena.com> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
