On 10/06/2021 21:33, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> [...]
>  
> So - again; What about having a Username-class which is just
> that, /any/ username?
Again, this would violates quite a lot of logic inside James itself.

I have personnally  no problem with contribution:

 - Allow subclassing of Username if that can help.

 - Introduce a (say) LoginName POJO within /protocols/imap

 - Anything helping modularizing protocols/imap

But changing such a central class for a specific use case, in the scope
of the entire James server, do not seem acceptable to me.

Benoit

>  
> --
> *Andreas Joseph Krogh*
> CTO / Partner - Visena AS
> Mobile: +47 909 56 963
> andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com>
> www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
> <https://www.visena.com>
>  
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org

Reply via email to