Great, we' craft a PR.
Den 10. juni 2021 16:48:02 CEST, skrev "btell...@apache.org" <btell...@apache.org>: > >On 10/06/2021 21:33, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote: >> [...] >> >> So - again; What about having a Username-class which is just >> that, /any/ username? >Again, this would violates quite a lot of logic inside James itself. > >I have personnally no problem with contribution: > > - Allow subclassing of Username if that can help. > > - Introduce a (say) LoginName POJO within /protocols/imap > > - Anything helping modularizing protocols/imap > >But changing such a central class for a specific use case, in the scope >of the entire James server, do not seem acceptable to me. > >Benoit > >> >> -- >> *Andreas Joseph Krogh* >> CTO / Partner - Visena AS >> Mobile: +47 909 56 963 >> andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com> >> www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com> >> <https://www.visena.com> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
