Hello Andreas, I spent literally a day running the release, I would have had enjoyed having such kind of feedbacks earlier, for instance when I first spoke about my will to move forward with 3.6.1 (15/09/2021 [1]) and then asked for help for the backports (16/09/2021 [2]).
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/server-dev@james.apache.org/msg71028.html [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3564?focusedCommentId=17415842&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17415842 What changeset would you consider critical for a MIME4J upgrade? On 3.6.x we shall minimize changes in order to provide stability and only target bugfixes. I'm not personally interested in 3.6.x backports, thus I would appreciate the community to involve more on this topic. Regards, Benoit On 03/12/2021 15:27, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote: > On Friday 03. December 2021 at 02:29:46, btell...@apache.org > <mailto:btell...@apache.org> <btell...@apache.org > <mailto:btell...@apache.org>> wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to propose a new vote for 3.6.1 release of the Apache > James > server. > […] > > > Is it possible to release MIME4J 0.8.7 and have JAMES-3.6.1 depende on > that? > > -- > *Andreas Joseph Krogh* > CTO / Partner - Visena AS > Mobile: +47 909 56 963 > andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com> > www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com> > <https://www.visena.com> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
