På fredag 03. desember 2021 kl. 09:43:32, skrev [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>: Hello Andreas,
I spent literally a day running the release, I would have had enjoyed having such kind of feedbacks earlier, for instance when I first spoke about my will to move forward with 3.6.1 (15/09/2021 [1]) and then asked for help for the backports (16/09/2021 [2]). [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg71028.html <https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg71028.html> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3564?focusedCommentId=17415842&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17415842 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3564?focusedCommentId=17415842&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17415842> What changeset would you consider critical for a MIME4J upgrade? On 3.6.x we shall minimize changes in order to provide stability and only target bugfixes. I'm not personally interested in 3.6.x backports, thus I would appreciate the community to involve more on this topic. I understnad, but these issues: https://github.com/apache/james-mime4j/pull/65 <https://github.com/apache/james-mime4j/pull/65> https://github.com/apache/james-mime4j/pull/66 <https://github.com/apache/james-mime4j/pull/66> …were not merged/fixed at the time. Now that they are merged it becomes relevant. -- Andreas Joseph Krogh CTO / Partner - Visena AS Mobile: +47 909 56 963 [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com> <https://www.visena.com>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
