Hi folks,

I think the code coverage report for James would be a helpful factor to
acknowledge how good enough of the tests have been written and will be
written.

Therefore I am experimenting and working on a POC for this adoption. The
first goal is to generate an aggregate report for James modules and then
based on the result we can observe and discuss more about actions to take
e.g: write more tests where are needed and helpful, or even set a code
coverage level for some specific modules.

Jira ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/JAMES/issues/JAMES-3903?filter=allissues
PR: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1522

Feedback and opinions are very welcome on this topic.

Best regards,

Quan

Reply via email to