Le lundi 22 décembre 2008 à 13:54 -0200, Martin Langhoff a écrit : > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Guillaume Desmottes > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> - Do we need this patch to interop with 8.2 correctly? What does it do? > > > > IIRC, this patch introduced new type of shared roster: @online@, > > @recent@ and @nea...@. Vanilla ejabberd only supports @a...@. > > Ah, so it's the "old" patch, reapplied. I'd like to learn more about > it, are there any notes on how it works...anywhere? Who's the original > author?
This patch was started by Rob and then finished/polished by P1. The rational was to create new kind of shared roster groups that would be a subset of @all@ to, hopefully, improve the scalability issues. > >> - Have you tested "vanilla" ejabberd for the bugs reported in > >> EJAB-730/731? > > > > Yes. That's why I always mention @all@ instead of @online@ in the > > reports, but the problems were the same. > > Thanks for confirming... > > > I think if things are working fine with this patch using the @all@ > > shared roster, there is good chance that fixes @online@ as well. > > Ok. I'll try with @all@, and then see if I can merge... > > > > m _______________________________________________ Server-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
