I vote in favor of dnsmasq.. speaking of F11.. we read some issues regarding F9, and the whole infrastructure needed to build it.. I must admit that i understood less than half of it.. is it related to the F9 base, or is it more related to XS issues?
cheers.. R 2009/10/4 Jerry Vonau <jvo...@shaw.ca> > On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 18:01 +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Jerry Vonau <jvo...@shaw.ca> wrote: > > > I was thinking of a clean way to introduce the forward > nameserver info > > > for the nameservice that the XS provides. The nice way that dnsmasq > uses > > > > I like dnsmasq, and I am liking it even more as time passes. The thing > > is: I am looking at F11/XS0.7 and... I want to do one transition > > instead of two. > > > > Maybe I should bite and get this transition in 0.6, and then go onto F11? > > > > Hmm hmm... > > > > At least require it now in xs-config.spec, that way the package is > installed, waiting to be configured. > > Still like the split bind/dnsmasq for now, solves some issues, leaves > the door open for a quick config file change in the future. > > Jerry > > > _______________________________________________ > Server-devel mailing list > Server-devel@lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel > -- Rodolfo D. Arce S. www.rodolfoarce.com irc.freenode.net rodolfo @ #fedora #centos
_______________________________________________ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
