On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Rodolfo D. <rodolfo.arc...@gmail.com> wrote: > I vote in favor of dnsmasq..
We all do. But I am leaning seriously towards F11. > speaking of F11.. we read some issues regarding F9, and the whole > infrastructure needed to build it.. I must admit that i understood less than > half of it.. is it related to the F9 base, or is it more related to XS > issues? It is just a bit moreannoying to the developers working on the XS itself. For end users, an F11-based XS will have security support into the future, plus some bugfixes. In itself, it doesn't get us any compelling improvements. Fire-and-motion as they say.* For developers, it does have some good things that are worthwhile. But developers, we're here to suffer and serve :-) cheers, m * - Skip to 'fire and motion' in the sw industry: http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000339.html -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff _______________________________________________ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel