> > I'm still pretty stressed about the whole CPU thing I went through > recently > > In fairness, you raised the issue on Sunday, posted a stack trace on > Tuesday, and were fixed on Wednesday. In retrospect, when I > saw your post > on Tuesday, I had some concerns about the bug being in the DNS code; I > should have followed up on that feeling, but this is one of > the only real > bugs we’ve ever encountered in his code. Ironically, he had fixed it > earlier, and I’d thought to put in a newer version of his > code, but when I > had looked at his web site, he already had a fix for new bug > in a version we > didn’t have, so I figured that we could wait for his > development to settled > down before we moved forward. > > --- Noel
Where in the commercial world would a new and relatively obscure bug such as this be diagnosed and fixed in this time-frame? I would rather view this in a positive light, as a demonstration of how effective OSS can be. Noel, with the benefit of hindsight you are seeing how the bug might have been removed earlier, but that doesn't imply a lack of foresight. And let's remember, we're talking about an alpha release of James here. -- Steve --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
