We've decided not to worry about Fast Fail right now. Don't want to break any RFC's. But in the future it's definitely something we'd like to do.
On Sat, 2003-11-22 at 21:39, Serge Knystautas wrote: > Brian C. Dilley wrote: > > Any ETA on fast fail? I just looked at SMTPHandler.java and saw that > > it wouldn't be too difficult as far as that goes, but the SpoolManager > > is another thing (Synchronized decisions wouldn't require a spool). > > Not really. We were just discussing how to script mailet configuration > on the dev list, and whatever we come up for this will likely get > incorporated into the SMTP handler. > > In the meantime, you could hack your adds to SMTPHandler yourself. Like > you say, it's not that difficult. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
