> If not, is it possible/advisable to suspend james' operation
programmatically?
You could shut JAMES down, do the DB maintenance, and start James up.
Ideally, as we redo some of the internals related to the spooler, we will
handle some things more robustly. Right now there are some cases were mail
can be lost should JAMES encounter OutOfMemory exceptions.
What happens is that JAMES might encounter and error, and so it sends the
message to the ERROR processor. Once there, if it encounters an exception,
it will GHOST the message. We probably need another approach. The message
is already in the system, so it need not be lost. We need some way, perhaps
a flag, to leave it where it is, but inactive.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
