noel; if you have the time<g> could you explain the below. I do read licenses and admit that to a large extent I am often confused. GPL does use the term free in their license. This TNEF (didn't even bother to see what it did) says the license is GPL. I think lesser GPL is closer to the apache license. Is that what you mean? That the GPL requirement is too stringent?
thanks bill page > -----Original Message----- > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 7:49 PM > To: James Users List > Subject: RE: TNEF (winmail.dat) attachments > > > Craig Raw wrote: > > > Has anyone ever written any code to extract TNEF > attachments in James? > > Not that I know of, no. Unfortunately, > http://www.freeutils.net/source/jtnef/ is not an acceptable > package for us. > No one has apparently explained to the author that the GPL is > not a free > software license. So even if you are successful with that > package, we won't > be able to distribute the result. > > --- Noel > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
