--- Bud Bach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was thinking we could drop 1.3 support if/when
> we get James 3.0/NG.
> > Also, I think it would be good to get 1.5 support
> for both 2.x as well
> > as the new version (usually new keywords are the
> stumbling block I've
> > come across).
>
> We are currently using Java 1.4 but are looking to
> jump to Java 1.5 ASAP.
> Do I read this correctly that James 2.2.0 will not
> work with Java 1.5?
I compiled James 2.2.0 with Java 5.0. Works fine.
Needed to uncomment some lines to comply with JDBC
3.0.
Gabor
Gabor Kincses
Running Mandrake Linux 10.0
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
