I am very new to James but have found it to be a good product with a solid foundation. I am disappointed to hear that there has been a lack in enthusiasm for this project as I feel it has great potential. In particular, its very well suited to my particular project, as it gives us a great deal of flexibility for the email side of our application.
What is the risk this project is ultimately going to be scrapped and I'll be stuck with a totally unsupported application? > From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "James Users List" <server-user@james.apache.org> > Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 10:32:58 -0500 > To: "James Users List" <server-user@james.apache.org> > Subject: RE: Gateway Authentication > >> There seems to be only one active developer: he is >> working on JamesNG, trying to migrate away from the >> Avalon beast. > > Actually, no. Development outside of the ASF infrastructure is not > development. I'd be fairly happy to see him as an active developer, working > with the others. > >> if the dart-throwers were burning up their keyboards cranking >> out new features, integrating submitted patches, making more >> than typo-level fixes to the website, figuring out a versioning >> strategy, or at the very least read up on lightweight containers >> etc. > > Lightweight containers is a fairly low priority compared to the many > features that are pending. > > Personally, I've been home less than 20 days so far this year, weekends > included, and including mornings like today when I am just packing to leave > for another 6-8 weeks straight. I'd love to have time to spend in SVN, > which is one of my highest unfulfilled priorities. Maybe tomorrow ... > > --- Noel > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
