Hi Serge,

Do you know what version of dnsjava (org.xbill.DNS.* classes) is being
used with James? The dnsjava jar has had many releases & I don't know
which version to look at. I couldn't find where this jar lives in the
james svn repository either.

I started to look at this 15 second thing out of curiosity. It is at the
mercy of how the org.xbill.DNS.ExtendedResolver behaves. It looks like
there is a setTimeout() method that could be exposed to the user to tune
if needed. Would be nice to get some error reporting in there.

Any info would be helpful.

-broc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 3:44 PM
> To: James Users List
> Subject: Re: 15 second delay on closed system
> 
> 
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:32:52 -0500
>   "John G. Norman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So . . . Why would the reachability of non-authoritative
> >secondary DNS make a difference either way?
> 
> My guess (very much so) is that James is trying the DNS 
> servers in reverse order.  This is a total guess, but I 
> can't be sure how it's loading the DNS configurations... I 
> don't think we've ever talked about what might happen if 
> you had one good and one bad DNS server.
> 
> Anyway, that does explain a 15 second timeout since you 
> see no CPU crunching and a 15 second delay, and most 
> importantly, it disappears when you remove the secondary 
> DNS.
> 
> I would confirm that the server can reach the secondary 
> DNS server (at the network level... use a tool like 
> nslookup).
> 
> --
> Serge Knystautas
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to