+1 from me. The current system is fine for a simple POP server, but is broken for anything more complex. The JavaMail option is the way forward IMHO. I believe (Noel?) discussed this before, although I can't find the messages in the archive.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 25 October 2005 01:36 > To: James Users List > Subject: Re: IMAP status > > On 10/24/05, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > IMHO the current MailRepository should become a MessageRepository and > only > > store Messages (without the Mail envelope and other informations from > the > > Mail object not already in the MimeMessage object). > > > > We could then add a JavamailStoreMessageRepository that allow you to use > any > > Javamail Store as a message repository for james. > > We should also add a MailMessageRepository that allow you to see a > > MessageRepository on top of our current MailRepositories (for backward > > compatibility) > > > > PS: I already have done some of this work (removed MailRepository, added > > MessageRepository) in the 3.0 "hacked" james I currently use. > > +1 > > -- > Serge Knystautas > Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com > p. 301.656.5501 > e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
