Would this not a great feature to include in james ? bye
Am Mittwoch, den 29.03.2006, 13:44 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > This is a branch that support distributed locking: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/james-ha > > If you are a programmer it should not be difficult to port the > distributed lock patch to the current release. > > Stefano > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > We currently have James running in a production environment (on a linux > > blade). We are building out a HA environment by adding another blade that > > shares the same NAS head and hence has the NFS mount point. > > > > Is there a way to run James in a hold-cold manner so that if the primary > > fails the secondary can take over? Is there a way to run James in a > > clustered manner? Is the locking mechanism to read the emails from the > > filesystem based on in-memory locking or is there support for filesystem > > based locking? In other words is it possible for 2 james JVMs to go after > > the same set of records on the filesystem? > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > !EXCUBATOR:2,442a756c93051489121780! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
