Thats right mx do a good job for such thinks.. But a failover solution whould be nice too..
bye Am Mittwoch, den 29.03.2006, 19:51 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > Norman Maurer wrote: > > Would this not a great feature to include in james ? > > If anyone find a way to include it in a unobtrusive/modular way that > does not bind us to specific licenses yes. > > I'm satidfied by the failover/cluster/high availability provided by the > multiple MX support of the SMTP protocol. > > SMTP is one of the few protocols that provides such solutions as part of > the specification. > > This doesn't mean that we don't need james-ha: I just think that it is > less important than for other services. > > Stefano > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > !EXCUBATOR:2,442ac9f2101161374753664! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
