On 10/6/2024 6:45 μ.μ., Martijn Katerbarg wrote:
Thanks. I’ve added a suggestion onto the PR to hopefully make this
clearer.
I also added a linebreak, so as to hopefully indicate to CAs that
linting alone during the self-audit is not enough to satisfy the
self-audit requirements.
Perfect, thank you Martijn!
I also received some suggested language from Corey and will wait one
more day before incorporating those to the ballot and restart the
discussion period with a v3.
Thanks,
Dimitris.
*From: *Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) <[email protected]>
*Date: *Monday, 10 June 2024 at 17:34
*To: *Martijn Katerbarg <[email protected]>, CA/B Forum
Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List <[email protected]>
*Subject: *Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-75 v2 - Pre-sign linting
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender
and know the content is safe.
On 10/6/2024 3:29 μ.μ., Martijn Katerbarg wrote:
Dimitris,
I’ve got a question as to the intent of the following line from
section 8.7:
“Effective 2025-03-15, the CA SHOULD use a Linting process to
verify the technical accuracy of Certificates within the selected
sample set.”
Is the intent here that the CA should re-lint the selected sample
set, even if they were originally linted during the issuance
process (as pre-issuance, post-issuance, or both)?
Yes, as this may include a new version of the Linting software. Please
let me know you have any suggested language to make this a bit more clear.
Thanks,
Dimitris.
Regards,
Martijn
*From: *Servercert-wg <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of Dimitris
Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg
<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
*Date: *Monday, 10 June 2024 at 12:36
*To: *CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List
<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject: *[Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-75 v2 - Pre-sign linting
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
SC-75 v2 Pre-sign linting
Summary
There have been numerous compliance incidents publicly disclosed
by CAs in which they failed to comply with the technical
requirements described in standards associated with the issuance
and management of publicly-trusted TLS Certificates. However, the
industry has developed open-source tools, linters, that are free
to use and can help CAs avoid certificate misissuance. Using such
linters before issuing a precertificate from a Publicly-Trusted CA
(pre-issuance linting) can prevent the mis-issuance in a wide
variety of cases.
The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos
of HARICA and endorsed by Corey Bonnell of Digicert and Ben Wilson
of Mozilla.
You can view the GitHub pull request representing this ballot here
<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcabforum%2Fservercert%2Fpull%2F518&data=05%7C02%7Cmartijn.katerbarg%40sectigo.com%7C7c0abb3a92ab40cdece708dc8962c3b7%7C0e9c48946caa465d96604b6968b49fb7%7C0%7C0%7C638536304511774997%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EnKzpp7LeHvFkCrPvp4yO6L5wyOaesGa3tWnoNsf0Jo%3D&reserved=0>.
Motion Begins
MODIFY the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management
of Publicly-Trusted TLS Server Certificates" based on Version
2.0.5 as specified in the following redline:
*
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/20af1b271f2b689344ae353d3e78dc6b772199db...cc88926a3dee348a364542e5e259e9c7cab1f747
<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcabforum%2Fservercert%2Fcompare%2F20af1b271f2b689344ae353d3e78dc6b772199db...cc88926a3dee348a364542e5e259e9c7cab1f747&data=05%7C02%7Cmartijn.katerbarg%40sectigo.com%7C7c0abb3a92ab40cdece708dc8962c3b7%7C0e9c48946caa465d96604b6968b49fb7%7C0%7C0%7C638536304511788339%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=3XfLt%2BuVtEivICDoYSCYOQUmabI6yzmR2PqzKX5CXlk%3D&reserved=0>
Motion Ends
This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure
for approval of this ballot is as follows:
Discussion (at least 7 days)
* Start time: 2024-06-10 10:00:00 UTC
* End time: on or after 2024-06-17 10:00:00 UTC
Vote for approval (7 days)
* Start time: TBD
* End time: TBD
_______________________________________________
Servercert-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
