On Apr 22, 2010, at 11:58 AM, daniel.daughe...@oracle.com wrote: > On 4/20/2010 4:39 PM, Tom Rodriguez wrote: >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~never/6943485 >> > > Summary: thumbs up > > I updated the bug comments with some code history stuff.
Thanks. > src/share/vm/opto/c2compiler.cpp > So it's okay to EscapeAnalysis when redefining classes? I believe so. If the methods are redefined then the code should be invalidated and recompiled. There might be one place where we need an evol dependency but I need to check into that. We had previously been running all the JVMTI tests with EA enabled at various points and hadn't seen any issues. > > src/share/vm/opto/compile.cpp > No comments. > > src/share/vm/opto/compile.hpp > No comments. > > src/share/vm/opto/graphKit.cpp > No comments. > > src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiExport.cpp > No comments. > > src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiExport.hpp > No comments. > > src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiManageCapabilities.cpp > In addition to can_generate_breakpoint_events, the > can_generate_frame_pop_events should be queried also when > setting can_access_local_variables. Why? tom
