Thank you Nils :-)

I had a question on the DCmdArgument<NanoTimeArgument> - I think I am not 
reading
this correctly:

Couple of questions please:


1) What is this doing?
 if (idx == len) {
143     
    // only accept missing unit if the value is 0
144     
    if (_value._time != 0) {
145     
      THROW_MSG(vmSymbols::java_lang_IllegalArgumentException(),
146     
                "Integer parsing error nanotime value: unit required");
147     
    } else {
148     
      _value._nanotime = 0;
149     
      strcpy(_value._unit, "ns");
150     
      return;

I haven't seen the specification at this level of detail, but I thought that if
you entered a digit value with no units that you got ns by default - i.e. we 
need to
be able to parse units, but they are not required.

2) What does this comment mean:

// WARNING StringArrayArgument can only be used as an option, it cannot be
// used as an argument with the DCmdParser
... DCmdArgument<StringArrayArgument*>

-- what can't you do with it more specifically please? Do you mean you can't
pass it as an argument to parse_value?

3) diagnosticFramework.cpp: copyright 2012NAME -- oops

thanks,
Karen

On Feb 14, 2012, at 12:33 PM, Nils Loodin wrote:

> Forgot an important point - the testing
> 
> First I ran all the testing we have for the tracing framework that makes use 
> of these commands.
> I have also debugged through with frivolous command lines to make sure we 
> don't do anything bad, like crash.
> Also I've manually tried to use all the combinations of the command line 
> arguments I can think of that should work, and that shouldn't. 
> 
> Regards
> Nils Loodin
> 
> On Feb 14, 2012, at 18:29 , Nils Loodin wrote:
> 
>> Thanks all for suggestions on improvements.
>> I have an updated webrev here:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nloodin/7145243/webrev.01/
>> 
>> Regards
>> Nils Loodin
>> 
>> PS: Note - Frederic Parain has graciously taken upon himself to sponsor 
>> this. Many thanks!
>> 
>> DS
>> 
>> On Feb 13, 2012, at 22:58 , Nils Loodin wrote:
>> 
>>> Hey all!
>>> 
>>> The new diagnostic command parser needs some additional specializations for 
>>> time and bytes, here included.
>>> Also a few fixes for crashes for some combinations of commandlines.
>>> 
>>> Tested by throwing a lot of different arguments on the parser, also by 
>>> running the tests in sun/tools/jcmd.
>>> 
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nloodin/7145243/webrev.00/
>>> 
>>> I would also need a sponsor to get this in..
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> Nils Loodin
>> 
> 

Reply via email to