Staffan, do you think you can take another look this?
Thanks!

On 2013-07-04 14:26, Alex Schenkman wrote:
Thanks Staffan for your comments.

The indentation is corrected in all files, sorry about that.

About the racing condition in PortFinder.java, you are absolutely right, there is no warranty that this port will be free.
I do not know a better way to do this. Any suggestions?
On the other hand, even if this fails every now and then, it will work most of the times and it is better than what we have today.
I have added better comments in PortFinder to reflect the problem.

The new webrev is here [1], at the same address than before.

Thanks!

[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/8014506/webrev.01/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Edsamersoff/8014506/webrev.01/>

PS:
PortFinder.java, line 37:
There is an extra <p/> tag that should be removed.



On 2013-06-26 13:54, Staffan Larsen wrote:
test/lib/testlibrary/jdk/testlibrary/PortFinder.java:

- This looks racy to me. There is no guarantee that the port will still be 
available after the call to close().
- Missing copyright notice.
- In comment "on of them" -> "one of them"

test/sun/management/jdp/ClientConnection.java:

- broken indentation
- inconsistent spacing in method calls. Sometime "joinGroup(address);" and sometimes 
"setSoTimeout( msTimeOut );". Should be without spaces.

test/sun/management/jdp/DynamicLauncher.java:

- type: binded -> bound
- inconsistent spacing in method calls

test/sun/management/jdp/JdpOffTest.java

- broken indentation

test/sun/management/jdp/JdpTestUtil.java

- broken indentation


I stopped reading here. Can we get these basic things fixed before the next 
review round, please?

/Staffan


On 26 jun 2013, at 12:21, Dmitry Samersoff<dmitry.samers...@oracle.com>  wrote:

Nils,

I'm sponsoring this push but don't see any review replies in this thread.

Webrev refreshed against latest tl is here:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/JDK-8014506/webrev.01/

-Dmitry


On 2013-05-27 12:25, Alex Schenkman wrote:
Please review these tests for the Jdp protocol.

There are three cases:
1) Jdp is off.
2) Jdp is on and using default address and port.
3) Jdp is on using custom address and port.

Tests:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nloodin/8014506/webrev.00/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Enloodin/8014506/webrev.00/>
Jdp feature enhancement:https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8002048
JDK CCC:http://ccc.us.oracle.com/8002048


Thanks in advance!

--
Alex Schenkman
Java VM SQE Stockholm

--
Dmitry Samersoff
Oracle Java development team, Saint Petersburg, Russia
* I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the sources.

--
Alex Schenkman
Java VM SQE Stockholm

--
Alex Schenkman
Java VM SQE Stockholm

Reply via email to