Hi Gerald, On 09/16/2013 12:52 PM, Gerald Thornbrugh wrote: > Sorry about the delay of my response.
No problem :) > I chose to place the /etc/SuSE-release file in front of the > /etc/os-release file because the > SuSE-release file was more clear and concise than the os-release file. I see. Yes, that does make a lot of sense. > I propose the following change: > > 2181 // Searching system-release (Red Hat) and os-release (other > linuxes) are a > 2182 // next to last resort. The os-release file is a new standard that > contains > 2183 // distribution information and the os-release file seems to be an > old standard > 2184 // that has been replaced by the lsb-release and os-release files. There seems to be a thinko here: "The os-release file is a ... and the os-release file seems to be ... that has been replaced by .. os-release" If you mean there are two different 'standards' for os-release, maybe it's better to say that. Thanks, Omair -- PGP Key: 66484681 (http://pgp.mit.edu/) Fingerprint = F072 555B 0A17 3957 4E95 0056 F286 F14F 6648 4681
