Looks good. On Feb 25, 2014, at 12:43 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
> Please, review the fix for: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6471769 > > > Open webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2014/hotspot/6471769-JVMTI-DEPTH.1 > > Summary: > > This is another Test Stabilization issue. > The fix is very similar to other JVMTI stabilization fixes. > It is to use safepoints for updating the PopFrame data instead of relying on > the > suspend equivalent condition mechanism > (JvmtiEnv::is_thread_fully_suspended()) > which is not adequate from the reliability point of view. > > Testing: > In progress: nsk.jvmti, nsk.jdi, nsk.jdwp, JTreg com/sun/jdi > > > Thanks, > Serguei >