Thanks, Christian!
Serguei

On 2/25/14 5:55 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
Looks good.

On Feb 25, 2014, at 12:43 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:

Please, review the fix for:
  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6471769


Open webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2014/hotspot/6471769-JVMTI-DEPTH.1

Summary:

  This is another Test Stabilization issue.
  The fix is very similar to other JVMTI stabilization fixes.
  It is to use safepoints for updating the PopFrame data instead of relying on 
the
  suspend equivalent condition mechanism (JvmtiEnv::is_thread_fully_suspended())
  which is not adequate from the reliability point of view.

Testing:
  In progress: nsk.jvmti, nsk.jdi, nsk.jdwp, JTreg com/sun/jdi


Thanks,
Serguei


Reply via email to