Chris,
In general I think this looks very good. Simple and well-commented code to
follow. I am missing a test, though. Please look at the
hotspot/test/serviceability/dcmd set of tests.
A couple of smaller comments:
Are Unsafe.defineAnonymousClass classes included? Should they be?
I think ClassHierarchyDCmd should include this code as well to restrict remote
access:
static const JavaPermission permission() {
JavaPermission p = {"java.lang.management.ManagementPermission",
"monitor", NULL};
return p;
}
diagnosticCommand.hpp:278: Missing “if” in the comment
vm_operations.hpp: Spelling error in “VM_PrintClassHierachry” and
“PrintClassHierachry”
vm_operations.hpp:461: Should the complete class be surrounded by "#if
INCLUDE_SERVICES” ?
heapInspection.hpp:272: The constructor and destructor does not seem to be
used. Because of that you should also change it to a AllStatic class.
heapInspection.cpp:339: Shouldn’t this be labeled as an “error”?
Thanks,
/Staffan
> On 10 feb 2015, at 03:00, Chris Plummer <chris.plum...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> [Once again the attachment went out but the main body was stripped. Not too
> sure what's going on, but here it is again. Sorry if you are getting this
> twice.]
>
> I've attached updated output:
>
> • I now use the Klass* of the ClassLoader instead of the CLD*, and this is
> documented in the help output.
> • The Klass* of the ClassLoader now immediately follows the class name, and
> is also included when printing interface names.
>
> The webrevs can be found at:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cjplummer/8054888/webrev.01/
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cjplummer/8054888/webrev.00-01/
>
> The first is the full webrev. The 2nd is what's changed since the last webrev
> that was reviewed. Changes since then include:
>
> • Support for printing the hierarchy of just one class.
> • -s option for optionally including subclasses when printing one class.
> • -i option for optionally including interfaces implemented by a class.
> • Output formatting changes.
> • Fixed some comment typos as requested.
> • I moved a couple of KlassInfoEntry methods out of the .hpp file and into
> the .cpp file as requested.
> • No longer keep track of the stack of superclasses when processing all the
> classes as requested. This also means the super_index field I added is no
> longer needed.
> • Moved some code within an already existing " #if INCLUDE_SERVICES" block as
> requested.
>
> thanks,
>
> Chris
>
