I see - thanks!
> On 8 apr. 2016, at 11:54, Dmitry Samersoff <dmitry.samers...@oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
> Staffan,
>
> I suspect its because of root/non-root. OS X attach doesn't work for
> non-root user. Test check it and skips silently. But if the test run
> under root, it tries to run and then fail.
>
> -Dmitry
>
> On 2016-04-08 11:10, Staffan Larsen wrote:
>> Why did this test start failing?
>>
>>> On 7 apr. 2016, at 20:35, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Dmitry,
>>>
>>> I agree with Tim.
>>> The message at L85 should not be alarming but look similar to the one at
>>> L107.
>>> Something, like this:
>>> 85 System.out.println("This test is not expected to work on OS X.
>>> Skipping");
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Serguei
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/7/16 11:13, Tim Bell wrote:
>>>> On 04/07/16 10:56, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
>>>>> Everybody,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please review small changes.
>>>>
>>>> Note: I am not a "R"eviewer in Serviceability. Free advice follows:
>>>>
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/JDK-8152679/webrev.01/
>>>>>
>>>>> Test that is not expected to work on OS X, detect OS X and exits.
>>>>
>>>> 84 // Coredump stackwalking is not implemented for Darwin
>>>> 85 System.err.println("Error! This test is not expected to
>>>> work on OS X.");
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It is not implemented, so landing here during a test run on Mac OS should
>>>> not be surprising.
>>>>
>>>> Rather than printing 'Error!' I suggest removing that alarming string, as
>>>> on line 107 .
>>>>
>>>> My 0x02 cents.
>>>>
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dmitry Samersoff
> Oracle Java development team, Saint Petersburg, Russia
> * I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the sources.
