On 6/22/16 15:31, David Holmes wrote:
On 23/06/2016 5:01 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 22/06/2016 19:36, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Alan, please, let me know if you support the Stanislav's suggestion.
I can go ahead and implement returning the
JVMTI_ERROR_ILLEGAL_ARGUMENT for invalid package names.
No objection from me. It would be good to first check the existing spec
and also the JNI spec to see if there any similar cases (so that the
update and new function is consistent). Off-hand, I can't think of any
functions that require the same check.
Taking GetLocalVariableTable as an example there is no validation that
names are legal, so there should not be a check in this case either.
David,
I agree with it.
Thank you for pointing to this JVMTI example.
I did not find in the JNI where the names are checked to be legal.
We are going to open a can of worms with this kind of check as there can
be many corner cases to cover.
Thanks,
Serguei
Thanks,
David
-----
-Alan
