On 23/06/2016 5:51 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 23/06/2016 00:20, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
:
I agree with it.
Thank you for pointing to this JVMTI example.
I did not find in the JNI where the names are checked to be legal.
We are going to open a can of worms with this kind of check as there
can be many corner cases to cover.
The primary use-case for this function is from within the CLFH callback
so have it return the unnamed module when calling with garage is
probably okay, it just needs to be specified.
It already is specified :) If the name is garbage then it is, by
definition, not a package that is associated with any module hence the
else clause kicks in and the unnamed module is returned.
David
-----
Will you update the webrev to reflect where we've got to this in this
discussion?
-Alan
