May I get it reviewed by serviceability team. Regards, Shafi
> -----Original Message----- > From: Shafi Ahmad > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 8:26 AM > To: serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net > Cc: Roger Calnan <roger.cal...@oracle.com> > Subject: RE: [10] RFR for JDK-8169961: Memory leak after debugging session > > May I get it reviewed by someone from serviceability group. > > Webrev link: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shshahma/8169961/webrev.01/ > This review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability- > dev/2017-July/021538.html > > Regards, > Shafi > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Shafi Ahmad > > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 12:52 PM > > To: serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net > > Subject: RE: [10] RFR for JDK-8169961: Memory leak after debugging > > session > > > > Hi, > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Langer, Christoph [mailto:christoph.lan...@sap.com] > > > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 9:01 PM > > > To: Poonam Parhar <poonam.ba...@oracle.com> > > > Cc: Shafi Ahmad <shafi.s.ah...@oracle.com>; serviceability- > > > d...@openjdk.java.net > > > Subject: RE: [10] RFR for JDK-8169961: Memory leak after debugging > > > session > > > > > > Hi Poonam, > > > > > > > > > > Line 182: Here, eventController.release() is called after the 'vm' > > > > is > > disposed. > > > > And eventController.release() causes the following statement to be > > > > executed on the eventcontroller thread after the 'vm' is disposed: > > > > > > > > JDWP.VirtualMachine.ReleaseEvents.process(vm); > > > > > > > > Which does not seem to be right. Someone from the Serviceability > > > > group can confirm the correctness of this change. > > > > > > I think this is okay, because with the new change shouldListen() is > > > called right after the thread returns from wait(). And this will > > > lead to the thread immediately exiting. > > > JDWP.VirtualMachine.ReleaseEvents.process(vm); > > > should not be called in this case. > > > > > > > Line 330: Instance variable 'VirtualMachineImpl vm' is removed > > > > from the EventController class. It is being used further down in > > > > its > > > > run() method. So I think it cannot be removed. > > > > > > The vm object is used from the outer class TargetVM, as > > > EventController is an inner class of it. > > > > > > So in my view it's all correct but still somebody of the > > > serviceability group might know better... > > > > Could someone from serviceability group review this. > > > > Regards, > > Shafi > > > > > > > > Best regards > > > Christoph > > >
