Hi Peter,

This is an issue for prod environments that is becoming bigger as clusters 
become bigger and bigger. I believe the answer to your issues and others 
related to the reliance of RMI has been proven by a project call Jolokia 
(https://jolokia.org <https://jolokia.org/>) which uses REST. At issue is that 
Jolokia is *not* a drop in JMXConnector replacement meaning you can’t use 
standard client tooling and this unfortunately compromises Jolokia’s 
usefulness. There is a JEP (http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/8171311 
<http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/8171311>) for providing a REST adaptor that 
unfortunately also misses the mark in that it’s not a JMXConnector. I’m not 
sure *why* these efforts have seemingly avoided the obvious solution which 
would be an REST based implementation of the JMXConnector interface as I 
believe that would be about the same about of work and would allow everyone to 
continue to use already available tooling. I have the task to prototype my own 
implementation running 2rd on my todo list right after I get my heap dump 
analysis tooling functional. So, yes, this is a real issue and I hope a 
discussion will lead to a more scalable solution.

Kind regards,
Kirk

> On Jun 11, 2018, at 4:14 PM, Péter Gergely Horváth 
> <peter.gergely.horv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I have been working with Big Data for a while and I have seen that a number 
> of the components have started to have their own custom baked solutions 
> (minimalistic Web UIs) for basic management operations, like showing metrics, 
> debugging etc instead of using JMX. 
> 
> I have the feeling that getting JMX working for dozens of different Java 
> services within a large cluster is an overly tough task, especially if you do 
> not want to make compromises around security. For me it seems, that at the 
> moment there is a gap between what the JDK offers regarding JMX 
> monitoring/management and what people would need in a real world setting to 
> use it effectively in an easy and secure way.
> 
> I am wondering if it would be possible to implement a Kerberos-based 
> authentication mechanism for JMX, allowing all services of a cluster to 
> authenticate JMX clients against a centrally managed Kerberos service, that 
> would also be officially supported by VisualVM so as to give an easy-to-use 
> user interface.
> 
> 
> Based on my understanding, this could either be a new protocol implementation 
> or assuming JDK-8171311: REST APIs for JMX gets done, an additional feature 
> around there to support GSS Negotiate/SPNEGO based authentication.
> 
> Could you please share your thoughts on this? Would anyone be interested to 
> sponsor this topic? 
> 
> Thanks,
> Peter
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to