Jc,

Could you send me a patch?
I'll sponsor the push.

Thanks,
Serguei


On 7/26/18 11:05, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 7/26/18 12:53 PM, JC Beyler wrote:
Hi all,

As we fixed the HeapMonitorTest to not fail from time to time, there seems to be the same issue and risk in HeapMonitorGCTest. Could someone review the similar fix:

 
test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/HeapMonitor/MyPackage/HeapMonitorGCTest.java
    No comments.

Thumbs up!

Perhaps consider filing a bug to refactor HeapMonitorTest and
HeapMonitorGCTest.java so that they share code... then we won't
have to fix the same bug in two places...

Dan



The risk is that the last interval is too big and no sampled object is live after the allocation method. If a GC happens before the check for sample code, it is possible no live objects still exist.

The solution is to reduce the sampling interval to make it highly unlikely for no samples to happen in any allocation iteration, keeping at least one sampled object live. But also check the GC'd objects in the system in case they did actually all already get GC'd.

Thanks,
Jc


Reply via email to