Sorry, it was review for 8215161

Some minor notes for this webrev:
- nsk/jvmti/scenarios/jni_interception/JI05/ji05t001/ji05t001.cpp
for some reason there are missed spaces before "?" in statements like
 (indx == 0)? "A" : "B"
see lines 190, 227, 243

Also there is some inconsistency with spaces around "%" operator -
in nsk/stress/jni/libjnistress001.cpp and nsk/stress/jni/libjnistress003.cpp
there are no spaces like
+    if (allocs%printperiod == 0) {

in other files the spaces are added
like (nsk/stress/jni/libjnistress005.cpp)
+        if (Exceptcalls % 1000 == 0)

--alex

On 12/10/2018 14:28, Alex Menkov wrote:
+1

One minor request.
Could you please fix
nsk/jvmti/NativeMethodBind/nativemethbind002/nativemethbind002.cpp
replacing

if (!(methNam == NULL))
and
if (!(methSig == NULL))

with
if (methNam != NULL)
and
if (methSig != NULL)

No need for new round of the review.

--alex


On 12/10/2018 13:54, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Jc,

LGTM

Thank you for the re-post!
Serguei


On 12/10/18 13:46, JC Beyler wrote:
Hi all,

Let's try this again; my apologies for the spam.

Could I get a review that normalizes spaces around comparisons and the ternary operator? This is the second of two webrevs to handle this.

Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcbeyler/8215160/webrev.00/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejcbeyler/8215160/webrev.00/>
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215160

Thanks,
Jc


Reply via email to