Thanks a lot, Jc!
Serguei
On 6/4/19 6:36 PM, Jean Christophe Beyler wrote:
Hi Serguei,
Looks good to me too :)
Jc
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 6:21 PM <serguei.spit...@oracle.com
<mailto:serguei.spit...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Thanks a lot, Alex!
Serguei
On 6/4/19 6:18 PM, Alex Menkov wrote:
> The fix looks good to me.
>
> --alex
>
> On 06/04/2019 16:30, serguei.spit...@oracle.com
<mailto:serguei.spit...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Please, review a fix for the JVMTI spec bug:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205126
>>
>> Webrev:
>>
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2019/8205126-jvmti-spec-popframe.1/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esspitsyn/webrevs/2019/8205126-jvmti-spec-popframe.1/>
>>
>>
>>
>> Related CSR:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225142
>>
>> Specdiff:
>>
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2019/8205126-jvmti-spec-popframe.1/jvmti-specdiff/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esspitsyn/webrevs/2019/8205126-jvmti-spec-popframe.1/jvmti-specdiff/>
>>
>>
>>
>> Summary:
>> The JVMTI PopFrame() spec does not match the implementation.
>> It says the specified thread can not be the current thread.
>> The fix aligns:
>> - spec with implementaion
>> - PopFrame spec with ForceEarlyReturn spec
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Serguei
--
Thanks,
Jc