Thanks a lot, Jc!
Serguei

On 6/4/19 6:36 PM, Jean Christophe Beyler wrote:
Hi Serguei,

Looks good to me too :)
Jc

On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 6:21 PM <serguei.spit...@oracle.com <mailto:serguei.spit...@oracle.com>> wrote:

    Thanks a lot, Alex!
    Serguei

    On 6/4/19 6:18 PM, Alex Menkov wrote:
    > The fix looks good to me.
    >
    > --alex
    >
    > On 06/04/2019 16:30, serguei.spit...@oracle.com
    <mailto:serguei.spit...@oracle.com> wrote:
    >> Please, review a fix for the JVMTI spec bug:
    >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205126
    >>
    >> Webrev:
    >>
    
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2019/8205126-jvmti-spec-popframe.1/
    
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esspitsyn/webrevs/2019/8205126-jvmti-spec-popframe.1/>

    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> Related CSR:
    >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225142
    >>
    >> Specdiff:
    >>
    
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2019/8205126-jvmti-spec-popframe.1/jvmti-specdiff/
    
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esspitsyn/webrevs/2019/8205126-jvmti-spec-popframe.1/jvmti-specdiff/>

    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> Summary:
    >>    The JVMTI PopFrame() spec does not match the implementation.
    >>    It says the  specified thread can not be the current thread.
    >>    The fix aligns:
    >>     - spec with implementaion
    >>     - PopFrame spec with ForceEarlyReturn spec
    >>
    >> Thanks,
    >> Serguei



--

Thanks,
Jc

Reply via email to