On 6/7/19 11:23, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
I read
documentation about CRS on following wiki https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/csr.
It says that CRS requires if command-line options are changes.
However I believe that fix don't change actual
behavior of 'granularity' option so no CSR is needed for this
small help update.
I see now.
Agreed, this dos not require a CSR.
Thanks,
Serguei
Any advise is welcome.
Leonid
Okay then.
I wonder now, if a CSR needs to be filed for this
change.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 6/7/19 09:10, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
Hi
Currently DCmdArgument<jlong> is
used to parse any numeric values in dcmd framework
including positive integer values for port, ttl etc.
Adding new type
DCmdArgument<size_t> requires adding more
specialized methods like
template <> void
DCmdArgument<jlong>::parse_value(const char*
str,
size_t len, TRAPS) {
and other to parse and validate any
*integer* parameters. See
I think that it is easier to use single
jlong for all integer like it is done now rather
than adding more types.
One might said that it would be better
to add size_t type and use it for all non-negative
integers. It would be good improvement for all dcmd
args parsing. As well as overall improvement of
parameters validation. (dcmd often don't throw
exception and just return in the case of incorrect
arguments). But sees like separate effort for whole
dcmd framework.
Leonid
Hi Leonid,
It looks good to me.
One minor comment on the
src/hotspot/share/services/diagnosticCommand.?pp
+ DCmdArgument<jlong> _granularity;
I'm curios if using size_t instead of jlong as in other files would be more unified.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 6/6/19 17:36, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
Hi
Could you please review following fix
which verify parameter for
Compiler.CodeHeap_Analytics command. So
jcmd just exits instead of crashing target
VM. Regression test was added, hs-tier1/2
passed.
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lmesnik/8225388/webrev.00/
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225388
Leonid
|